.svg "Heart (Symbol). by mystica")
crystal
01-30 11:22 AM
any idea?
wallpaper Heart (Symbol). by mystica
fatboysam
03-05 04:23 PM
Hi
I had contributed $1000 towards my FSA dependent care account in 2010.
Now, in order to claim this amount, both husband and wife should be working, this is not the case with me, as my wife was not able to find a job in 2010.
Will this amount be reimbursed to me by the FSA management company ? as my son went to a preschool, and i paid the school fees every month.
Thanks
I had contributed $1000 towards my FSA dependent care account in 2010.
Now, in order to claim this amount, both husband and wife should be working, this is not the case with me, as my wife was not able to find a job in 2010.
Will this amount be reimbursed to me by the FSA management company ? as my son went to a preschool, and i paid the school fees every month.
Thanks
ragz4u
01-27 01:55 PM
Keep it up :)
2011 holding dear heart glad posted
Sakthisagar
07-28 03:33 PM
Looks like Indian Politicans says.
"Gareebhi Hatayenge" aage badayenge" badayi karenge woh karenge yeh karenge
President's view of immigration is same like Indian Politicans
President Obama’s Take on Immigration � Row 2, Seat 4 (http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/07/28/president-obamas-take-on-immigration/)
"Gareebhi Hatayenge" aage badayenge" badayi karenge woh karenge yeh karenge
President's view of immigration is same like Indian Politicans
President Obama’s Take on Immigration � Row 2, Seat 4 (http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/07/28/president-obamas-take-on-immigration/)
more...
iamsachin
11-06 01:54 PM
I applied for my EAD and AP extension on AUG 17 2009 and my EAD was expiring on AUG 29th 2009. While my wifes EAD and AP got approved, I had an RFE as I had not sent the recent photographs so I sent that and the receipt date for that was OCT 9 2009.
I continued working and got paid, after speaking to friends I realized, getting paid on a Expired EAD is not right.
I have taken a infopass to discuss this with USCIS to get an update.
One more point I wanted to make was that my payroll company doesn't know about this and doesn't care. But if I bring it up then .they might immediately terminate my employment.
How do I fix this? Please suggest.
I continued working and got paid, after speaking to friends I realized, getting paid on a Expired EAD is not right.
I have taken a infopass to discuss this with USCIS to get an update.
One more point I wanted to make was that my payroll company doesn't know about this and doesn't care. But if I bring it up then .they might immediately terminate my employment.
How do I fix this? Please suggest.
heathere3
12-24 11:26 AM
Hi, I'm sorry to inform you but the mutliyear EAD cards are not here yet, so your EAD will be for only one year. But congratulations on getting that!:D
EB3 ROW
PD Aug 2005
RD July 2 2007
AP rec'd Nov 2007
EAD ??? Still not rec'd
EB3 ROW
PD Aug 2005
RD July 2 2007
AP rec'd Nov 2007
EAD ??? Still not rec'd
more...
Blog Feeds
08-12 10:30 PM
Interesting study. The headlines this morning around the country are on the subset of children of illegally present parents which Pew is estimating is about 7% of all children born in the US. It's not a surprise to see the GOP getting increasingly crazy as they know that in the long run they'll go the way of the Whigs unless they either convince Hispanic voters to support them or disenfranchise enough of them that they can continue to win elections with only Anglo voters.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/new-pew-study-shows-25-of-children-born-to-immigrants.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/new-pew-study-shows-25-of-children-born-to-immigrants.html)
2010 Extra Credit T-shirt: Love
kumar_77
02-28 09:07 PM
First check if the check you or your company sent for H-1 fees got cashed , if so see behind the check ( normally banks post scanned copy of check ) the Receipt number will be written behind the check ..hope this helps
more...
malibuguy007
09-11 05:14 PM
Anyone?
hair Search: Light
gc_maine2
07-06 03:48 PM
don't create new threads, check in this thread you might find answers.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4478
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4478
more...
SGP
09-09 04:12 PM
How I wish the date for EB3-I were at 08NOV03. :mad:
hot Light blue Love 2 Text With
nsnb
06-01 03:11 PM
Hi,
I have my labor certiifcation approved and currently filed for I-140.
I-140 is not approved yet.
I have an offer from another employer with very similar job profile.
My 6 yrs of H1 is getting over in 2010 summer.
My prioriy date is Dec/07.
What are my options
1) Can i change a job and keep same priority date(as job profile is very similar)
2) Do I have to start from zero again?If yes,how much time I have to get priority date assigned again(considering my H1 bgets over in 2010 summer?)
I will appreciate your comments
Thanks
I have my labor certiifcation approved and currently filed for I-140.
I-140 is not approved yet.
I have an offer from another employer with very similar job profile.
My 6 yrs of H1 is getting over in 2010 summer.
My prioriy date is Dec/07.
What are my options
1) Can i change a job and keep same priority date(as job profile is very similar)
2) Do I have to start from zero again?If yes,how much time I have to get priority date assigned again(considering my H1 bgets over in 2010 summer?)
I will appreciate your comments
Thanks
more...
house Crystal heart paperweight
imh1b
05-19 09:39 AM
Economic recovery will create more demand for H1Bs definitely. Quota will be over in a day.
tattoo Bright blue Love 2 Text With
chanduv23
09-13 12:11 PM
Please see this letter sent by governors of 13 states to the Senate and Congress on 09-11-07.
http://shusterman.com/pdf/h1b-governors.pdf
Old news - this is the one Arnold put up on his website few days back
http://shusterman.com/pdf/h1b-governors.pdf
Old news - this is the one Arnold put up on his website few days back
more...
pictures Search: Bright
gcformeornot
03-22 05:07 AM
so. But since your 140 is approved the PD is yours. You have to find new employer, start from Labor process again.
dresses The journey of 3E Love began
solaris27
05-27 09:22 AM
Hi
My Wife was working as sole proprietor and she is planning to open Single Person LLC.
She is also planning to start her second business.
1) Can she do multiple businesses in ONE LLC?
2) Will she file multiple Schedule C for EACH business ( If you have one person LLC you can file taxes in Schedule C) ?
3) Does she has to apply for new Federal ID or she can use same she was using in Schedule C for this new LLC also?
Thanks
My Wife was working as sole proprietor and she is planning to open Single Person LLC.
She is also planning to start her second business.
1) Can she do multiple businesses in ONE LLC?
2) Will she file multiple Schedule C for EACH business ( If you have one person LLC you can file taxes in Schedule C) ?
3) Does she has to apply for new Federal ID or she can use same she was using in Schedule C for this new LLC also?
Thanks
more...
makeup Turquoise Love 2 Text With
ansari
10-29 09:50 PM
Hello,
If one gets stuck with H1b revalidation, and then gets approved after 6 months. Is there any issues when coming back to the US at the POE entry?
Please let me know.
S
If one gets stuck with H1b revalidation, and then gets approved after 6 months. Is there any issues when coming back to the US at the POE entry?
Please let me know.
S
girlfriend Love @ the center of Athens
wandmaker
03-03 06:00 PM
I have an approved I-140 and have a pending I-485 filed with NSC, received date 15 Aug 07. NSC I-485 processing date was moved up to Aug 15 a few days ago.
Was wondering if anyone else with similar received dates got an approval or some form of reply from NSC?
Fill up your profile and use IV tracker - you should be able to dice and slice the data
Was wondering if anyone else with similar received dates got an approval or some form of reply from NSC?
Fill up your profile and use IV tracker - you should be able to dice and slice the data
hairstyles The special Omegamania/Heart
yogi_04
11-19 01:15 PM
i have to get my medical exam for canada immigration again.
dies my i485 medicals work.if so how should i proceed.
i called doctors for canda medicals no one is giving clear answers
can some one throw some ideas.it will be of great help
Thanks very much
dies my i485 medicals work.if so how should i proceed.
i called doctors for canda medicals no one is giving clear answers
can some one throw some ideas.it will be of great help
Thanks very much
Blog Feeds
08-10 10:00 PM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced new fees for persons seeking authorization to travel to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program. The authorization is obtained prior to travel through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), and typically remains valid for two years. Beginning on September 8, 2010, the ESTA travel authorization will require a valid credit card for payment of a $14.00 fee. The purpose of the fee is to finance efforts to promote international travel to the United States, and cover operational costs associated with running the ESTA program. Individuals who already possess ESTA authorization do not need to pay the fee until it is time for them to reapply.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/E50a-PU_F58
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/E50a-PU_F58/)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced new fees for persons seeking authorization to travel to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program. The authorization is obtained prior to travel through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), and typically remains valid for two years. Beginning on September 8, 2010, the ESTA travel authorization will require a valid credit card for payment of a $14.00 fee. The purpose of the fee is to finance efforts to promote international travel to the United States, and cover operational costs associated with running the ESTA program. Individuals who already possess ESTA authorization do not need to pay the fee until it is time for them to reapply.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/E50a-PU_F58
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/E50a-PU_F58/)
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
No comments:
Post a Comment